Evaluation and Ranking of Blood Sampling Gloves in Clinical Laboratory Environments Using a Hybrid MEREC–VIKOR Approach

Authors

  • Mohammad Javad Arab Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences and Computer, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran.
  • Saeid Mehrabian Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences and Computer, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-8074
  • Pouria Solouki Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3017-7336
  • Narges Jafari Zareh * Islamic Azad University, Sav.C., Saveh, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22105/ahse.v2i3.47

Abstract

The optimal selection of blood sampling gloves in laboratory environments plays a vital role in ensuring personnel safety, preventing the transmission of infections, and maintaining the quality of clinical services. Despite the wide variety of available glove types and the numerous criteria influencing their selection, there is a clear need for an objective and comprehensive decision‑making framework in this field. In this study, the Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) method was employed for criteria weighting and the VIšekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Rešenje (VIKOR) method for ranking alternatives, in order to evaluate 20 commonly used blood sampling gloves based on 10 technical, safety, human, and economic criteria. The required data were collected through a 9‑point Likert questionnaire with the participation of 30 experts in occupational health and safety. The results indicated that nitrile gloves with lotion, powder‑free nitrile gloves, and blue nitrile gloves were identified as the best options, respectively. These findings emphasize that integrating performance characteristics (such as comfort and tactile sensitivity) with protective features (such as chemical and mechanical resistance) is essential in the selection of clinical gloves.

Keywords:

Multi criteria decision making, Method based on the removal effects of criteria, VIKOR, Blood sampling gloves, Laboratory safety

References

  1. [1] Fay, M. F., Beck, W. C., Checchi, L., & Winkler, D. (1995). Gloves: New selection criteria. Quintessence international, 26(1), 25. https://www.quintessence-publishing.com/deu/de/article/838308/quintessence-international/1995/01/gloves-new-selection-criteria
  2. [2] Hübner, N. O., Goerdt, A. M., Mannerow, A., Pohrt, U., Heidecke, C. D., Kramer, A., & Partecke, L. I. (2013). The durability of examination gloves used on intensive care units. BMC infectious diseases, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-226
  3. [3] Ali, A. S., & Ali, W. Y. (2020). Proper material selection of medical gloves. Journal of the egyptian society of tribology, 17(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21608/jest.2020.116602
  4. [4] Witzig, C. S., Földi, C., Wörle, K., Habermehl, P., Pittroff, M., Müller, Y. K. (2020). When good intentions go bad—false positive microplastic detection caused by disposable gloves. Environmental science & technology, 54(19), 12164–12172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03742
  5. [5] Preece, D., Lewis, R., & Carré, M. J. (2021). A critical review of the assessment of medical gloves. Tribology - materials, surfaces & interfaces, 15(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2020.1730619
  6. [6] Freitas, J., Lomba, A., Sousa, S., Gonçalves, V., Brois, P., Nunes, E., … ., & Alves, P. (2025). Consensus-based guidelines for best practices in the selection and use of examination gloves in healthcare settings. Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15010009
  7. [7] Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525
  8. [8] Ghasemi, P., Ali, S. M., Abolghasemian, M., Malakoot, R. A., & Chobar, A. P. (2025). A stochastic sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks for used solar photovoltaic systems: Meta-heuristic comparison and real case study. Sustainable operations and computers, 6, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2024.11.001
  9. [9] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Locating routing problem (LRP) of distribution of priority support items to ground forces in war conditions. Engineering management and soft computing, 10(1), 262–292. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22091/jemsc.2024.11320.1206
  10. [10] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Modeling the positioning of support forces in future battles using data envelopment analysis and the principles of natural and managerial accessibility. Defensive future studies, 9(32), 65-98. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2024.2007554.1720
  11. [11] Sorourkhah, A., Azar, A., Babaie-Kafaki, S., Shafiei Nik Abadi, M., & Author, C. (2017). Using weighted-robustness analysis in strategy selection (case study: Saipa automotive research and innovation center). Industrial management journal, 9(4), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.22059/imj.2018.247856.1007361
  12. [12] Montazeri, F. Z., Sorourkhah, A., Marinković, D., & Lukovac, V. (2024). Robust-fuzzy-probabilistic optimization for a resilient, sustainable supply chain with an inventory management approach by the seller. Big data and computing visions, 4(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2024.481945.1208

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Annals of Healthcare Systems Engineering

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Arab, M. J., Mehrabian, S., Solouki, P., & Jafari Zareh, N. (2025). Evaluation and Ranking of Blood Sampling Gloves in Clinical Laboratory Environments Using a Hybrid MEREC–VIKOR Approach. Annals of Healthcare Systems Engineering, 2(3), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.22105/ahse.v2i3.47

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.