Machine Learning-Based Prediction of ICU Admission in COVID-19 Patients Using CT-Derived Biomarkers

Authors

  • Somayeh Livani Clinical Research Development Unit (CRDU), Sayad Shirazi Hospital, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-4208
  • Mohammad Mohajer Tabrizi * Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-0632
  • Karim Aqerkakli Clinical Research Development Unit (CRDU), Sayad Shirazi Hospital, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
  • Sona Roshani Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22105/ahse.v3i3.70

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exhibits highly variable clinical outcomes ranging from mild symptoms to critical illness requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Early identification of high-risk patients remains essential for optimizing resource allocation. Recently, Computed Tomography (CT)-derived biomarkers such as gynecomastia, hepatic steatosis, and epicardial fat thickness have been proposed as potential indicators of systemic metabolic dysfunction associated with disease severity.  This study aimed to develop and evaluate Machine Learning (ML) and deep learning models for predicting ICU admission in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using CT-derived imaging biomarkers, including gynecomastia, fatty liver, and epicardial fat thickness. A total of 341 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and CT-derived variables were extracted, including age, gynecomastia subtypes, hepatic steatosis, epicardial fat thickness, and retro-mammary fat measurements. Multiple ML models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, ExtraTrees, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and XGBoost) were trained using a pipeline incorporating imputation, scaling, and SMOTE-based oversampling. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was applied for model interpretability. Among all models, XGBoost achieved the best overall performance (accuracy = 0.884, F1-score = 0.333), followed by ExtraTrees with the highest ROC-AUC (0.729). Epicardial fat thickness and hepatic steatosis were consistently identified as the most important predictors across feature importance and SHAP analyses. Deep learning models demonstrated inferior generalization performance (ROC-AUC ≈ 0.41–0.53), likely due to limited dataset size and class imbalance. CT-derived metabolic imaging biomarkers, particularly epicardial fat thickness and hepatic steatosis, provide meaningful predictive value for ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. ML models, especially ensemble methods, outperform deep learning approaches in structured clinical datasets. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) enhances clinical interpretability and supports the integration of imaging biomarkers into predictive decision-support systems.

Keywords:

COVID-19, Computed tomography biomarkers, Machine learning, Intensive care unit admission prediction

References

  1. [1] Wynants, L., Van Calster, B., Collins, G. S., Riley, R. D., Heinze, G., Schuit, E., … ., & van Smeden, M. (2020). Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: Systematic review and critical appraisal. Bmj, 369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1328

  2. [2] Boyce, C. J., Pickhardt, P. J., Kim, D. H., Taylor, A. J., Winter, T. C., Bruce, R. J., … ., & Hinshaw, J. L. (2010). Hepatic steatosis (fatty liver disease) in asymptomatic adults identified by unenhanced low-dose CT. American Journal of Roentgenology, 194(3), 623–628. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2590

  3. [3] Aslan, Ö., Bayraktaroğlu, S., Çinkooğlu, A., Ceylan, N., Savaş, R., & Oktay, A. (2021). Prevalence of incidental gynecomastia by chest computed tomography in patients with a prediagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. European Journal of Breast Health, 17(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.6251

  4. [4] Kim, M. S., Kim, J. H., Lee, K. H., & Suh, Y. J. (2020). Incidental gynecomastia on thoracic computed tomography in clinical practice: Characteristics, radiologic features, and correlation with possible causes in South Korean men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 14(3), 1557988320908102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320908102

  5. [5] Petta, S., Argano, C., Colomba, D., Cammà, C., Di Marco, V., Cabibi, D., … ., & Craxì, A. (2015). Epicardial fat, cardiac geometry and cardiac function in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Association with the severity of liver disease. Journal of Hepatology, 62(4), 928–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.030

  6. [6] Gorter, P. M., van Lindert, A. S. R., de Vos, A. M., Meijs, M. F. L., van der Graaf, Y., Doevendans, P. A., … ., & Visseren, F. L. J. (2008). Quantification of epicardial and peri-coronary fat using cardiac computed tomography; reproducibility and relation with obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis, 197(2), 896–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.08.016

  7. [7] Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

  8. [8] Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30). Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf

  9. [9] Browning, J. D., Szczepaniak, L. S., Dobbins, R., Nuremberg, P., Horton, J. D., Cohen, J. C., … ., & Hobbs, H. H. (2004). Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: Impact of ethnicity. Hepatology, 40(6), 1387–1395. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.20466

  10. [10] Aksoy, S. H., Aydin, S., Yurdaisik, I., & Dalkilic, O. (2021). May hepatic steatosis be associated with gynecomastia and epicardial fat? A retrospective study of 599 male patients. https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr420370

  11. [11] Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Armon, A. (2022). Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need. Information Fusion, 81, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011

  12. [12] Kazemi, M. A., Hemmati, S., Moradi, B., Sharifian, H., Firooznia, K., & Nikravangolsefid, N. (2020). COVID-19 and gynecomastia: What is the relationship? Academic Radiology, 27(8), 1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.003

Published

2026-07-12

How to Cite

Livani, S., Mohajer Tabrizi, M., Aqerkakli, K., & Roshani, S. (2026). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of ICU Admission in COVID-19 Patients Using CT-Derived Biomarkers. Annals of Healthcare Systems Engineering, 3(3), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.22105/ahse.v3i3.70

Similar Articles

1-10 of 33

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.